PA APCO member wins

AFC Advisor Award

 

Fred Rosencrans was named the 2007 AFC Most Improved Advisor at the APCO International Conference.  Fred is part of a network of Local Frequency Advisors throughout the United States.  Local Advisors are APCO members who, on a volunteer basis, perform the technical analysis for the coordination process.

 

Congratulations Fred!

 


APCO International President Willis Carter addresses

Non-reimbursable Rebanding Costs with the FCC

A Message from our PA Frequency Coordinators

     There are many complex issues that plague the public safety communications spectrum today.  There is a much greater demand for frequencies, the spectrum is congested, there is an increased use in wireless systems and the job of frequency coordination is becoming much more complex.

      We are responding by increased of use of technology, advanced propagation/interference studies and programs and an increase of data exchange between coordinators and agencies.  The required FCC 601 form (frequency application) is available electronically on-line, and there is a much better screening process in place.  Through the local APCO advisor volunteers, which John and I do for Pennsylvania; we perform a critical step in the assignment of frequencies.

     We will do our best, as Pennsylvania frequency advisors, to obtain the frequencies requested by our applicants while protecting the licensed public safety frequency holders throughout Pennsylvania. 

All of the above information sparks the critical question of when re-farming the spectrum will take place to alleviate some of the congestion.

Thanks in advance,

Fred J. Rosencrans

How to Contact Fred or John:

Fred Rosencrans, PA State Frequency Coordinator
Luzerne County 911
Work: (570) 820-4400
frosen@luzernecounty911.com

John Ankenbrand, PA State Frequency Coordinator
Luzerne County 911
Work: (570) 820-4400
johnank@luz911.com

 

 

Hi Everyone,
Although this post is lengthy I am not going to apologize for it's length because I feel it has to be said.

I was pleased with the amount of information in a consumer reports article at the URL given below on VoIP. It gives a very good explanation of what is happening with VoIP telephones and the pros and cons of the service along with price comparisons and references. I know we are still working on receiving data from wireless 9-1-1 phone calls via cellular telephones at many locations throughout the US and still have not worked out legislation on obtaining locations from MLTS/PBX systems, but VoIP is coming full speed ahead and is definitely something that must be considered sooner than later. NENA is working on what they call I2 and I3 architecture to help guide development in a direction that will provide 9-1-1 PSAP's with telephone number and location data, but there is a large difference in the way it will occur compared to the way we receive 9-1-1 telephone calls today and implementing a standard by NENA is a far cry from getting the 9-1-1 and VoIP industry to accept and follow it versus legislation requiring it.

Here is the URL for the consumer reports article:
http://www.consumersearch.com/www/internet/voip/fullstory.html

You may also want to look at the website set up by the FCC to provide VoIP information at:
http://www.voip911.gov/

You may want to also take a look at the NENA webpage on VoIP at:
http://www.nena.org/VoIP_IP/index.htm

Although NENA claims to be an independent organization representing 9-1-1 there is a relationship between NENA and Intrado that seems to be in the the vested interest category and I wonder how long the appearance of independence can be maintained by NENA. I belong to both NENA and APCO and I can't say that APCO does much better in the independent category, although I do agree with APCO's stance on testing accuracy of wireless telephones.

The problem is, the NENA/Intrado relationship at the present time, seems to be one of the few organizational efforts actually working on delivering call-back number and location from VoIP customers.

The VoIP providers, even though they claim to be working on delivering call-back number and location information to PSAP's, from my viewpoint, are not doing so well in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania as evidenced by a number of VoIP calls that we have received lately with no information or that go to a private answering service contracted by the VoIP providers which adds an unknown amount of time to the length of time before a VoIP 9-1-1 call actually reaches the point where the person calling can receive help, or in other cases the VoIP call is received by other PSAP's arbitrarily picked by the VoIP provider in another state which again adds additional time until that PSAP can figure out where in the heck the call should actually go and deliver the call information to the correct PSAP.

I am frustrated by the lack of cooperation that we have been receiving from the various VoIP providers involved in these 9-1-1 calls, and in some cases, the amount of time it actually takes to even figure out who in the heck the VoIP provider is so I can try to get information from them. There is no requirement for VoIP providers to follow that says they must identify themselves to a 9-1-1 PSAP.

I stand by comments I have made before that the VoIP industry has 9-1-1 between a rock and a hard place and even though the FCC tries to regulate them, they just go crying to a legislator and get them to tell the FCC to lay off and pay lip service to all of us about how much they are doing to provide information to the 9-1-1 PSAP's. Something must be done sooner than later to get the VoIP industry to deliver call-back number and location to the correct 9-1-1 PSAP's.

While I am just one small voice and don't have anything to do with whether or not our PSAP accepts or rejects VoIP 9-1-1 calls, I am getting to the point of wondering what else can be done to force the VoIP providers to deliever call-back number and location of a 9-1-1 VoIP call to the correct PSAP now.

Sure VoIP is cheaper, if you have a high-speed internet connection or cable connection in place now, but if you don't, it evens out to about the same cost as present telephone service and that is before the ability of providing 9-1-1 PSAP's call-back number and location.  If the costs of providing call-back number and location are added to the costs of VoIP service then it will be more expensive and even out to about the same costs of a POTS line.

My point here, is that perhaps the PSAP's in the United States should mount an extensive public education campaign via every possible means of dissemination to the general public about the failures of VoIP to provide true Enhanced 9-1-1 service. We all went down this same path with wireline and wireless 9-1-1 to establish the benefit of the greater gain to all people by initiating a smaller fee on 9-1-1 service, which up to this point has only been applied to wired and wireless telephones. Now the wired and wireless entities are having to pay for the increasing problems and failure of VoIP service when VoIP customers dial 9-1-1 who receive our PSAP services for free. Since this is a problem created by the VoIP providers I believe it is only fair for the VoIP providers and customers to pay their fair share to support 9-1-1 PSAP's so that ALL of their customers can also benefit from the ability of the PSAP's to send emergency services to them.

If you want to label this as a stalemate or being deadlocked, I believe you are correct. But this cannot continue.

We, as 6000 or so individual PSAP's, do not have the ability to legislate anything against the hundreds of thousands of customers that VoIP claims to serve, it must be done on a coordinated nationwide basis. I see the minority viewpoint being followed in so many cases in decisions from various courts. Why can't we accomplish something that has been proven time and again to save lives for the majority of people dialing 9-1-1, which is having the call-back number and location of the caller delivered to the correct PSAP, from a VoIP customer now.

I'll get down off my soapbox now and let the chips fall where they may.
Skip Walls

Carlton B. Walls III, ENP
Project Analyst
Lancaster County-Wide Communications
717-664-1106
cwalls@lcwc.co.lancaster.pa.us
Website: http://www.lcwc.co.lancaster.pa.us

 

APCO International Job Openings
in Daytona Beach, FL

Job Descriptions


APCO PBX/MLTS Subcommittee Seeks YOUR HELP in
providing recognition to organizations who are taking
initiative to provide solutions to provide 9-1-1 centers with correct address information from a Private Branch Exchange/Multi-Line Telephone System (PBX/MLTS)!

more details

 

800 A.L.E.R.T Issues a Call to Action

800MHz WAVE 4 REBANDING 
of 
United Sates, Mexican, and Canadian Border
Write to your representatives in Congress urging them to help expedite negotiations with Canada and Mexico!  This affects Region 36 in PA!

Click here to go to apcointl.org for more details

 

What is T.E.R.T.?  Find out how you can help.

View a PowerPoint Presentation

 

 

 

Steering Committee to investigate the possibility of a Telecommunicator Emergency Response Taskforce

The Keystone NENA Chapter along with the PA APCO Chapter, in collaboration with PEMA, have formed a steering committee to investigate the possibility of a Telecommunicator Emergency Response Taskforce.  Currently in its preliminary stages, the committee is investigating what paperwork and legal issues must be completed to form a state-wide team.  The taskforce will serve as a resource, aiding centers, both statewide and nationally, in times of need.  The North Carolina NENA chapter carved the program from the original Incident Dispatch Team concept, and created a state-wide team.  The idea was to support each other in times of natural or man-made disasters.  That NC Team was deployed to St. Tammany Parish, LA, after Hurricane Katrina.  They served as dispatchers and call takers, and provided relief to the 911 Dispatchers who were overwhelmed from the disaster. 

Serving on the PA Steering Committee:

Audrey Rychalsky, Chair, PA APCO/York County 911

Steve Keeley, PA APCO/Montgomery County 911

Guy Napolillo, PA NENA/Fayette County 911

Cindy Geiger, PA APCO/Berks County 911

Cindy Dietz, PA NENA/York County 911

JJ McFarland, PA APCO/PSP Harrisburg

Scott Krater, PA NENA/Schuylkill County 911

Chuck Hodges, PA APCO/Montgomery County 911

Ray Blouch, PEMA Representative

If anyone has any questions, or would like additional information, please contact the Steering Committee Chair, Audrey Rychalsky at ARRychalsky@ycdes.org or 717-840-2906. 

 

 

 

Denver 2005 APCO International Convention

The PA Chapter presented the former governor of Pennsylvania, Tom Ridge, with an appreciation award for all he did for public safety in Pennsylvania during his tenure.  Governor Ridge took the time out of his busy schedule to talk with members of the chapter.

 

 


Pictured from left: James J. McFarland (Past President of PA APCO and current Chairman of the PA Public Utility Commission 911 Taskforce, M. Jay Groce, III, ENP, David Newcomer

Award of Excellence

M. Jay Groce, III Senior Technical Coordinator for the Chester County Department of Emergency Services was honored at the PA APCO Spring Conference with an Award of Excellence following his two year term as chairman of the PA Public Utility Commission 911 Task Force, 2003-2005.  Jay has been a member of APCO since 1997 (Life Member), Past President of PA APCO, and is the PA APCO representative to the APCO International Executive Council.

 

From Audrey Rychalsky, Member at Large, PA APCO Executive Board:
I have been asked to participate with the "VoIP Funding and Regulatory Work Group".  The committee chair is Mike McGrady and he is assisted by Dorothy Spears-Dean.  We had our first conference call on 10/14/2004 and during that session; we broke the group down into five separate work groups.  Those groups include the following:
 
1.  Current Funding Model:  Telecommunication services and information services are treated as distinct and separate.  Since VoIP is considered an information service, it is essentially unregulated.  Telecommunications is subject to regulatory oversight.  VoIP providers are not required to contribute to universal service programs, pay access charges for interconnection with the PSTN, provide E911 services, or comply with NANP protocol.  The impact of this is a loss of surcharge revenue attributable to VoIP 911 calls.
 
2.  Potential Funding Model:  IP convergence is the consequence of data centric migration within information systems and info technology.  Any potential VoIP funding model must provide a mechanism to revitalize the 911 infrastructure and facilitate direct IP connectivity within the 911 network.  A potential funding model is a communications framework based on the network layers model.
 
3.  Funding for On-Going Day-to-Day Operations:  This is the subcommittee I have been asked to facilitate, and my co-members are Randy Hird from OnPoint, and Dale Morgenstern from AT&T.  We have been asked to look at the impact VoIP 911 calls will have on PSAP operations and how funding will impact those operations.  Investigate how VoIP trend analysis and legislative actions will affect funding; how universal service programs, access charges for interconnection with the PSTN, provisions for E911 service and compliance with NANP protocol financially will impact VoIP.  Make recommendations for what the most appropriate methods for determining funding levels and distribution. 
 
4.  Funding for Upgrading or Migration to the New IP Based 911 Infrastructure:  Funding models must be directly related to current PSAP equipment lifecycles and equipment replacement schedules.  Cost effectiveness must drive migration.  We are remodeling the 911 infrastructure, not demolishing it.  The end result will mean direct IP telephony and PSAP interoperability.
 
5.  Funding for 911 Implementation in Areas Where There is No 911 Service:  Because VoIP providers do not currently contribute to the payment of access charges, and if the current regulatory access charge scheme remains unchanged, sharp increases in VoIP growth could result in steep increases in public program surcharges to ensure basic telephone service is affordable in rural, high-cost areas.  Customers may not be able to afford broadband connectivity or may be beyond the reach of broadband networks. 

 

 

PENNSYLVANIA APCO CHAPTER HONORS LONG-TIME MEMBER

Past President James R. Giannini, former Director of Public Safety for Montgomery County, Pa  was recently honored for his many years of service in supporting the Pennsylvania Chapter of APCO.  Jim now works for Plant Equipment in California. He became a member of APCO in 1982 and served as Chapter President in 1988. Jim co-chaired the East Coast Regional Conferences in Pennsylvania in 1986 and 1992. With the expertise gained in this, Jim served as the Chairman of the very successful National APCO Conference held in Pittsburgh in 1992.

In 1991, the Montgomery County Communications Center received one of the first APCO Certifications. Jim Giannini and Joe Hamilton, also a former Director of Montgomery County Public Safety, worked together to develop and write two Public Safety manuals which were made available Nationwide through APCO. The Standard Operation Procedures manual was written in 1990 and was followed up in 1992 by the Human Resources Manual.

Most recently Jim developed the first Pennsylvania APCO website and supported it even after his relocation to the West Coast. Jim now lives in California with his wife Linda, and son Jamie. 

 

Wireless Update:  Funds approved for distribution

On 2 June 2005, PEMA Director Adrian King sent letters to the Chief elected official of each County with the total eligible wireless funding from the requests submitted in March of this year.  This was followed-up with a letter to 9-1-1 Coordinators with a breakdown of eligible funding and anticipated quarterly payments. 

Each County should complete and return the Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) Payment Enrollment Form.  This will directly deposit wireless funds and speed the process.  In addition to the EFT, the County Certification needs to be signed and returned to PEMA.  The certification, signed by a county official, states that the funds will be used in accordance with the law and approved plans.

So long as these documents are returned you can expect the first quarterly payment to be deposited by 1 August and subsequent payments made each quarter.  For budgeting purposes, keep in mind that quarterly payment amounts are anticipated and the actual amount may change as wireless providers remit to the fund.

 

APCO International
Appoints Interim Executive Director

click here for more info

See what the PUC 911 Task Force
has accomplished

Click here to see the new PUC 911 Task Force webpage

Chris Fischer Announces Candidacy for 2nd VP
Chris Fischer, Executive Council Representative for the Washington chapter, today announced her candidacy for 2nd Vice President of APCO International after the Credentials Committee approved her application. Fischer is an APCO Life Member and recently received the Weldon Joe Blair Award for Leadership at the 2004 Conference & Exposition in Montréal. She also was named the APCO International Communications Center Director of the Year for 2004 at this year's conference. As director of Valley Communications Center (Valley Com) in Kent, Wash., she oversees call-answering and dispatching for 27 agencies, with a staff of 110. In August 1977, when Valley Com opened its doors, Fischer was one of the original 11 dispatchers hired for the center, starting as a dispatch supervisor. She was promoted to deputy director in 1980 and to director in 1987. Fischer has long been involved in APCO's partnership with the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA). She helped co-write the CALEA communications standards, which stand today as the models for communications best practices. She now serves on the commission's Standards Review and Interpretation Committee. So strong is her belief in the benefits of accreditation that, as soon as the communications standards were established, she started the process at her own center. In November 2001, Valley Com became the first CALEA-accredited center in the state and on the West Coast, as well as the sixth nationwide. Recently, Fischer's center finished an 11-year process to construct and move into a new facility. Members will get a chance to learn more about Fischer in the November issue of Public Safety Communications/ APCO BULLETIN, when she begins writing her Candidate's Corner column.

BORASH RESIGNS AS
PRESIDENT-ELECT OF APCO

October 1, 2004, Washington, DC - The Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) International announced today that Diana Borash, Communications Director for WestComm, a consolidated emergency communications center providing the police, fire and emergency medical dispatch service needs for the cities of West Des Moines, Clive, and Urbandale, Iowa, has resigned as President-Elect of the association.

Borash joined the Iowa Chapter of APCO in 1985, transferring her membership to Minnesota when she moved there in 1989 and back to Iowa when she accepted her position at WestComm in November 2003.  She served on the APCO Training Committee for several years and was president of Minnesota APCO from 1995-1998.  She also served as the chairperson when Minnesota hosted the APCO International Conference and Exposition in 1999.

On an international level, Borash served on the APCO International Fire Committee from 1994-1996.  She was a member of the APCO Institute Advisory committee for three years and chaired the group for two years.  She also served on the APCO International Strategic Planning Committee.  Borash was elected to the APCO International Board of Officers in August 2002.

"Diana has been such an asset to APCO through her years of service on the state, national and international levels," APCO International President Greg Ballentine said.  "Her passion and enthusiasm is unmatchable and will be greatly missed."

Borash is stepping down from the APCO International Board of Officers after more than two years of service citing "health challenges and increasing demands on time from work and family."

"It has been a joy working with each of you," Borash stated in a letter to the APCO International Executive Council.  "It has been my honor as well as a privilege to serve this great Association.  Please know I will continue to serve APCO as my time and health allows.  I appreciate each and every one of you and wish you the very best."

 

FCC Adopts Solution To Interference Problems Based By 800 MHz Public Safety Radio Systems

In a decision that supports public safety, the Federal Communications Commission adopted a solution that will eliminate interference in the 800 MHz band. APCO International President Vincent R. Stile commends the FCC for its decision. To read President Stile's letter click here

The Pennsylvania Chapter of APCO has embarked upon a new project in conjunction with the Pennsylvania Keystone Chapter of NENA.

Multi-line telephone systems (MLTS), such as private branch exchange (PBX), Key or Centrex systems, often give 9-1-1 centers only the address and phone number of a single, central location within the system. That location is frequently the "front office" and may be located in a different building, city or even a different state.

In order to focus attention on this type of problem, the Pennsylvania Chapters of APCO and NENA are embarking on a program to bring this problem to the attention of the general public.

In addition, we want schools, businesses, hospitals, government facilities, hotels/motels, and other large building administrators and owners to be aware of this problem and acquire solutions for it.

Finally, we want our legislators to be aware of this problem and to amend Act 78 of 1990 to include wording which will require owners of MLTS equipment in Pennsylvania to provide the 9-1-1 centers or PSAP's with location (station) identification for 9-1-1 calls made from their systems.

One of the ways we have chosen to focus attention on the problem is the production of a brochure which will be provided free of charge to any PSAP in Pennsylvania for distribution by them to appropriate audiences. This brochure may be seen here (32 MB PDF format).

For any PSAP desiring to acquire this brochure please fill out the MLTS Brochure Request Form here (0.2 MB PDF format).

Florida Chapter Establishes Disaster Relief Fund

The Florida Chapter of APCO developed a statewide Public Safety Communications Mutual Aid Plan that went into action immediately following Hurricane Charley and continues now as the state deals with the aftermath of hurricanes charley, Frances and Ivan. In addition to its mutual-aid efforts, the Florida chapter started a Disaster Relief Fund that will help telecommunicators who suffered personal losses from the hurricanes. The Florida Chapter of APCO has set up a relief fund for donations. All proceeds collected by the chapter's Disaster Committee will go directly to the communications officers in need. For more information about the Disaster Relief Fund, visit the Florida chapter's Web site at www.apco-florida.org.

 

The Cayman Islands Need You

Juliette Gooding, manager of Cayman Islands 9-1-1 Emergency Communications, has asked for APCO's help in finding 9-1-1 telecommunicators who are APCO-certified. The island was damaged seriously by Hurricane Ivan and all Gooding's current staff have been affected. She wrote that some have left the island and those who remain need some time off to take care of their personal needs, such as repairing housing and finding places to live. Needed now are at least four or five personnel who can come to the island to work for at least 1-2 years on contract, to allow the current staff to have time off to do the above. If you are interested, contact Gooding via e-mail at ebony@candw.ky or cay.911@candw.ky. Please pass the word to your fellow APCO-certified telecommunicators and let's show our island colleagues how much we care!

 

 

 

© 2004 PAAPCO

Another Site Designed by Schell's Web Design